With the debate season coming to a close, six Hoboken Board of Education candidates squared off during a forum at Hoboken Elks Lodge 74, ahead of a pivotal election on November 8.
By Katherine Guest and Matthew Reate
Candidates spoke openly about course and curriculum reform, the lack of students in Hoboken High School (HHS) due to low Q-SAT scores, and the Hoboken School District vs HoLa case that is affecting taxpayer dollars.
On the Parents United slate, Francis “Chipper” Benway, Jessica Nelson, and Jennifer Rossini all spoke about their concerns on program improvements for HHS and how to concentrate on professional development for teachers so that students are capable of learning to their greatest capacity.
â€œAt this point, one of my main reasons in getting involved in the BOE is that Iâ€™m not confident in sending my 10-year-old daughter to the high school. Test scores are down over the last four years. Weâ€™ve failed Q-SAT [five out of five years] … If we canâ€™t get 80 percent in Q-SAT we have real issues to look at,” said Benway.
“We need to get better programs into the high school. We need to get professional development for teachers. Weâ€™re looking at new STEM programs, but are we preparing our teachers to teach those programs. If theyâ€™re not prepared to teach the programs then the kids wonâ€™t be prepared to learn the programs.”
According to Rossini, about 15 percent of middle school students continue their education in Hoboken High School. In order to increase enrollment, she suggested to partner with local businesses for internships, have a dual language program, and partner with Stevens University to create a better STEM program.
Jennifer Evans, three-term candidate for the BOE, countered Benway’s argument by saying, “Why don’t you talk to folks who have sent kids there?” referring to HHS. Evans encourages parents to meet the staff, kids, and review the curriculum before drawing conclusions about the high school.
Irene Sobolov also confirmed there’s been a partnership with Stevens University for over 100 years and 25 other partnerships including, but not limited to, local businesses, Google, and ABC Disney.
Along with significant improvements for students and staff members, one major concern from the public are tax increases. Questions such as where are tax dollars going, what budget line item should be reduced and is it necessary for taxpayers to fund the ongoing HoLa lawsuit were all asked.
“The first line item I would reduce is the noneducational spending, namely the HoLa lawsuit. It should not go out of the tax payers pockets for this lawsuit. The other thing I would say is, I’m not quite certain why we have a $5.8 million surplus? I’m not certain that’s in Hoboken’s taxpayers better interest,” said Nelson.
In the district budget for 2016-17, Hoboken Public Schools (HPS) adjusted the 2 percent tax levy cap because of enrollment growth and improved facilities, which results in a 3.65 percent levy increase and property tax increase of $67 per year on average.
Forward TogetherÂ Sheillah Dallara candidate says homeowners who have $500,000 homes, will pay $13 in taxes for every 1% increase in tax levies, which goes directly to the Hoboken School District counting public and charter schools into the equation.
The state requires a 2 percent surplus estimated as $1.1-2 million a year. Sobolov then explained, the HSD has a levy surplus, maintenance surplus, and also a capital surplus. New facilities such as a science and robotics labs, new gyms, and new bathrooms among other improvements came out of the surplus budget.
In a previous meeting, the BOE approved a contract for a student of special needs costing the district approximately $120k for one student. The approved contract also, came out of the surplus budget rather than creating a new line item.
By the end of the forum, ballots 1, 2, and 4 vocalized about punctuality when attending a BOE meeting in support for the children in Hoboken’s community. Evans specifically mentioned that the candidates on the right side of the panel weren’t present during any of the board meetings.
then why aren’t the incumbents sending their kids to the high school? i read that one of the incumbent candidates stopped after 8th grade. why were the public schools good enough all those years and not after? be honest
You’re an idiot. The incumbent of which you speak’s son graduated from Hoboken High School. LEAVE CHILDREN OUT OF IT.
The article omitted the Parents United goon that pointed a flashlight in the eyes of 1-2-4 (Forward Together) candidates when it was their turn to speak. Photos and details here: https://grafixavenger.blogspot.com/2016/10/debate-shock-parents-united-brings.html
You, the Parents United slate stand with slimeballs like that goons making noise whenever 1-24 spoke, and the goon that pointed a flashlight in the eyes of 1-2-4.
VOTE 1-2-4. Repudiate the GOONS.
After seeing the Parents United supporters behavior I would never consider voting for them
Your position is the same as educational research professionals and interested parents. The short of it is that current research demonstrates that the dual “choice” produces segregation, the charters are funded more per student and the outcomes are not positive from an education achievement standpoint. As a matter of fact, Hoboken Schools, charter and public, are used as a prime example of this.
Maybe someone should ask Mr. Benway about his lack of involvement in his own children’s school. Very upsetting that he is considering running for BOE when he is not trying to assist in efforts to improve the school his children currently attend.
Don’t let the crooks get their hands back on our school budget.
Why would anyone vote for Parents United after they brought the “On the Waterfront” wannabees to try and intimidate 1-2-4???
And remember this the next time Romano rolls around town smiling trying to get your vote. He did nothing at the debate to contain these gorillas, he did nothing when that ape followed around Theresa Minutillo and her 5 year old. He is their enabler