In a letter to the editor, Jersey City Council President Joyce Watterman gives her take on why political fundraising isn’t all that matters in the mayoral race.
Dear Editor,
As I navigate the Jersey City mayoral race, I find myself increasingly critical of how the media portrays this political contest.
The focus on “horse race” elements—like the $2 million war chest of former Governor Jim McGreevey and the combined $1 million reported for Councilman James Solomon and Commissioner Bill O’Dea —oversimplifies a complex narrative.
This simplistic approach misleads voters and diminishes the significance of the issues at stake.
In a race where financial backing is often equated with viability, I am reminded that my campaign is fundamentally different. My commitment lies in serving the underserved communities of Jersey City, prioritizing their needs over fundraising ambitions.
The fixation on campaign contributions lacks context; it fails to acknowledge that many candidates, particularly those like myself who are dedicated to grassroots efforts, may not have the financial resources to compete in fundraising with those political figures with fat cat friends.
When your politics focus on delivering for those who are often overlooked, it doesn’t come with an expectation of campaign contributions. Instead, it requires relentless dedication and a willingness to fight for what is right.
As a female candidate, I face unique challenges that complicate this narrative. Historically, campaign contributors have been predominantly men, creating an environment where female candidates struggle for equal footing.
While I embrace my identity as a woman in politics, this novelty can overshadow my qualifications and commitment to service. The media’s tendency to highlight gender rather than policy positions detracts from substantive discussions that voters deserve.
I knew I was in for a fight when I entered this race, and I remain ready for that challenge. My candidacy represents more than an electoral challenge; it embodies a movement toward inclusivity and representation in Jersey City politics.
I aspire to create a platform where all voices are heard, especially those from marginalized communities who have been sidelined in political discourse.
Yet, when media narratives focus primarily on financial metrics or sensationalized aspects of the campaign, they risk alienating those very constituents who need advocacy the most.
This horse race mentality can also lead to voter apathy. When people perceive elections as contests won by those with deep pockets rather than by genuine commitment to community service, they may feel disillusioned and disengaged from the political process.
Media outlets must shift their focus from mere fundraising totals to the real-life implications of candidates’ platforms and policies.
Additionally, the media’s presentation of campaign finance numbers often lacks critical analysis regarding expectations tied to contributions.
When they report that candidates have a combined $3 million on hand, they fail to explore what that money represents in terms of obligations and influence.
Large contributors typically have specific interests, raising important questions about accountability and transparency in governance. Are these candidates beholden to their donors or genuinely committed to serving the public interest?
Without this context, voters are left with a skewed understanding of what these figures signify, undermining our democratic process.
In conclusion, while I respect the media’s role in informing voters about candidates, I urge you to adopt a more nuanced approach. Let us prioritize discussions around policy impact and community engagement over superficial financial comparisons.
As I continue my journey in this race for mayor, I believe true leadership comes from serving others—not from having the largest campaign fund. It’s time for our political discourse to reflect that reality.
Joyce Watterman
President, Jersey City Municipal Council
Candidate, Jersey City Mayor
Waterman: “I can’t raise enough money to be competitive, let me distract you with bullshit.”
Just drop out already
Will she stay the course and give up her council seat or try to make a deal with the big money raisers? Especially since the big donors probably have their own picks for council president. I don’t see the mayoralty in her future.