30-year tax exemption in Ward F to generate $6M in revenue for Jersey City

4
507

The Jersey City Council voted 6-3 to approve a 30-year tax exemption for Bergen Avenue Urban Renewal LLC, expecting to realize $6 million in revenue, an additional $2 million compared to the city’s conventional taxes, over the same 30-year period.

Jersey City Council President Rolando Lavarro itemized the benefits of the tax abatement as “60 construction jobs, 8 permanent jobs, affordable trust fund of $106,563, and an annual service charge over 30 years of $6,486,000, as compared to conventional taxes for Jersey City’s portion of $4,577,000.”

“That’s $2 million more, more than $2 million that Jersey City will realize over 30 years as revenue for Jersey City,” he explained.

Yvonne Balcer, a Journal Square resident and staunch Mayor Steven Fulop critic, however, saw it differently.

She first challenged the city council on why taxpayers will be paying for the building’s open space that is not opened to the public.

“So because they are getting open space on their roof, it doesn’t mean that I, Yvonne Balcer, can go on top of their roof and use their open space.”

Balcer also asked if they have considered the number of students this five-story building will aid the already crowded Jersey City classrooms.

According to Ward 5 Councilman Michael Yun, the building will have 16 – two-bedroom units, 30 – one-bedroom units and 12 studios but “expect less than 4 students.”

“This is why there are more than 30 kids in the classrooms: because Jersey City says that there will be only [be] four kids in a building that is massive,” argued Balcer. “The board of ed is going up and the county is going up.”

While Ward F Councilwoman Diane Coleman argued that, as a social service agent, she has more about 10,500 constituents and 89 percent of them are homeless – or the other 12 percent are “hidden homeless.”

Balcer challenged whether or not city council has considered the rights of the “2,500 people who lose their homes” because they can’t afford their taxes.

Resita Dixon, a member of SEIU 32BJ union, also testified against the tax abatements because within the 58 units there is no affordable housing included.

“KABR Group has consistently failed to include onsite affordable housing in any of the Jersey City projects including one of its larger projects, 1 Journal Square, where out of 744 housing units, zero will be set aside for working families like mine.”

During the final votes, Lavarro made it clear that this is one way to incentivize and improve all of Jersey City and not just downtown.

“We are making sure that we are bringing these projects, these developments to the south side of Jersey City, and to other parts of Jersey City, outside of downtown and the waterfront.”

It was Councilman-at-Large Daniel Rivera, Ward C Councilman Richard Boggiano and Councilman Yun who voted against.

4 COMMENTS

  1. Of course the JC taxpayer doesn’t save a dime from this PILOT since the “savings” just shift the taxes to the School Board. The JC taxpayer will pay more in school taxes, less in municipal taxes and save nothing. Back when Mayor Fulop was Councilman Fulop he’d have been the guy telling everyone that. He should go back and watch videos of himself everytime he thinks about proposing a PILOT like this claiming the taxpayers are getting a “deal.”

  2. It’s time to vote this mayor tax abatement tax abatement that’s all I ever hear of this mayor no new schools no more police officers or raises no more firehouses for the thousands of people he plan to bring just more tax abatement for his crony developers.He hasn’t done one thing good to improve the lives of the long term residents of this beautiful city, just bring in more people to crowd the city.The reason people are leaving New Jersey at an alarming rate is because of mayors like him.

  3. Fulop opposed the wholesale granting of tax abatements when he was a councilman. As Mayor he has been giving the store away to the big money developers. The small homeowner will suffer big time from a reval while his developer pals will be paying no school or county taxes.
    Fulop knows that eventually the State will order a reval and he can take cover and blame the State for our taxes doubling and in many cases tripling. Next time you are near Newport and you see all of the development he has supported, just remember that for every tax abatement he has supported, we, the small homeowner, are subsidizing the rich brats who are living in those towers and the greedy developers who build and build, and build. Take heart! They will build, and WE will pay.

Comments are closed.